programming is fine, you nerds. it's implicitly nullable types that aren't fine. i've been saying this for years
@typhlosion why does that even exist!!!?
@typhlosion formalism is... not that important... because people hack over bullcrap with more bullcrap... ;w;
I don't know wether I'm sad that everything is awful or amazed that we make such wonderful things with a crap framework
@Efi oh i meant the first thing, the apology for inventing the null reference. it was Tony Hoare's fault in ALGOL 60 and he calls it his "billion-dollar mistake"
@typhlosion I know, but... I kept reading...
@Efi o
i don't really have any opinion on that ;w;
@typhlosion I am dying of null
@Efi you need a doctor. here, i'll give you a valid reference [laugh track]
@typhlosion you killed me dead
@typhlosion
You're going to love C# 8, aren't you?
@Terxbor i don't know anything about C#, let alone C# 8
@typhlosion
C# 8 is going to introduce a switch to make reference types non-nullable by default.
@Terxbor GOOD, probably
@typhlosion
Yeah, except I think I forgot the definition of "default" while writing that toot.
But C# has also been doing a lot to make null a lot more useful too.
On a side note, your fursona pic is really cute.
@typhlosion so have I...