eidolon @shaderphantom@awoo.space

In Kotlin, I almost wonder if you could use the continuations API to construct VkCommandBuffer procedurally using a DSL and have them automatically resolve resources used and map into a submittable VkCommandBuffer by evaluating the full continuation.

Similarly in Rust, a VkFence signal Future could use an atomic semaphore to signal from an IO dispatcher that it has become unblocked as a result of a successful await on the VkFence, so the next call to poll will be Poll::Ready(()). Then, you can do any sort of async programming around it.

Having some thoughts about Vulkan and how to model the Vulkan async programming model in language constructs to enable language-level async Vulkan programming...

What if there was a construct to, for example, suspend on a VkFence in Kotlin? Surely that can't be too hard to abstract over.

Hey PayPal, Central Time isn't always GMT-6.

whitelist federation

@KitsuneAlicia@octodon.social bahahaha the most recent reply on that thread:

... Therefore, trying to wedge Tusky’s code change into this article about licensing is comparing apples and Cherenkov radiation.

@KitsuneAlicia@octodon.social app in question: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.gabai.gabby&hl=en_US

@KitsuneAlicia@octodon.social and Gabby, their own Tusky fork, which I think is relevant to point out in this particular scenario since it's on the Play Store right now.

@KitsuneAlicia@octodon.social

The whole point of Tusky being free software is that it doesn’t matter if the developers implemented a restriction/feature you don’t like. Take the software, remove that restriction (you can do so, because it’s free!) and go your merry way.

There are a lot of folks both in this thread and on this network who are wildly misunderstanding FOSS and missing this point entirely... it's hilariously disingenuous for alexgleason here, despite an apparent zealot of software freedom, completely misunderstanding that you can just... fork the damn app and republish it without the blocking code, and that is enough to qualify for freedom 0...

Client-side blocks aren't really effective in the grand scheme of things given that, but good lord this is just stupid concern trolling on his part.

steam has the bundle of both turok remasters for $9 just a thought

shout outs to rutracker

upset online at spongebob meme that suggests squidward is a cop

@roxy@snouts.online well they're wrong imo

oogity boogity boo your praxis is useless

Nobody will though. Clout's more important to some folks here than actual action.

Break some computer laws and hack into nazi infrastructure imo.

I have a new display name

Sure love this completely fucking useless dogpiling actual purity culture we've reprocessed straight from Twitter.

Sure, scream at an app developer for choosing not to put a client-side domain block in their open source app. That'll help people learn who the real bad guys are. Sure as hell stopped the bad guys, didn't it?