Show newer

maybe it's because trait objects are constructed very differently from C++ vtables that we tend to shy away from them. but maybe trait objects really could help us solve a broad class of issues without diverting to more academic data-oriented design solutions and without losing out on that much performance

Show thread

this leaves me to question the Rust ecosystem's approach of making everything generic by default; monomorphization is expensive though the runtime is very very fast, but maybe the value in monomorphization isn't universal and we should be using trait objects more than we do?

Show thread

huh. AActors also are just associated with root USceneComponents in the world, which is why actors aren't treated like a scene graph.

which leaves the question, how does the engine handle multithreaded anything with the way it's architected? for as modern as this engine is, it seems very traditional in its architecture...

Show thread

fascinated that UE4, the world class game engine known for high performance rendering, seems to use virtual functions everywhere even on the hot paths.

this use case may be better suited to Cassandra but that's not what we have today right now

Show thread

worse yet, this is Amazon Aurora MySQL -- shouldn't their storage driver be better than this considering the pricing?

Show thread

I'm really confused because this table doesn't even have any foreign keys or external references, only a handful of columns, and the primary key is just an incrementing integer. this is just a normal use case, but inserting 200 rows via batch insert takes upwards of 4 or 5 seconds. I purged the table and did the same insert and it still took about 700ms.

Show thread

hey does anyone know why mariadb/mysql would chug hard when inserting rows into a table with only 1 million rows and a single secondary index on a single column

chrome's near monopoly is worse than the ie6 nightmare

Show thread

it's actually just broken: the CSP the page serves includes directives that override the unsafe-inline declaration anyway. somehow chrome thinks this is normal and goes along with it, but firefox rightfully errs on the safe side?

Show thread

of all the industries trying to modernize for the internet still, i think the healthcare industry pulls the most nonsensically insecure and dangerous bullshit

Show thread

this is because their login page is an embedded okta login which requires unsafe-inline enabled in the content security policy (!!!! what the fuck!!!!!), and firefox seems to reject this by default

Show thread

a certain major healthcare identity provider for a certain major hospital network has managed to completely break their login page on firefox

eidolon boosted
Show older
Awoo Space

Awoo.space is a Mastodon instance where members can rely on a team of moderators to help resolve conflict, and limits federation with other instances using a specific access list to minimize abuse.

While mature content is allowed here, we strongly believe in being able to choose to engage with content on your own terms, so please make sure to put mature and potentially sensitive content behind the CW feature with enough description that people know what it's about.

Before signing up, please read our community guidelines. While it's a very broad swath of topics it covers, please do your best! We believe that as long as you're putting forth genuine effort to limit harm you might cause – even if you haven't read the document – you'll be okay!