@Nurbs reverse engineer it!
i saw a toot about it elsewhere but i can’t find it so: basically don’t trust mastodon for things you want to stay Actually Private. instance admins can read DMs, and instance admins can read the private posts of anyone their users follow. this is sort of inherent to the current architecture. and for all twitter’s sins, i trust the admins to not leak random people’s DMs more than i trust every instance admin ever.
birdsite
@Kortney but I know voluntary donations don't look great to investors or stockholders, and even if you make a profit on them, you're not gonna build that into mega-money Fortune 500 Superbowl ad revenue levels of profit, which is apparently the only thing worth doing anymore, so good luck
birdsite
@Kortney the sad thing is, I bet a lot (A LOT!) of people would be okay with voluntarily kicking in a buck or two to twitter, a lot like a Patreon thing. Given they have millions of users and only a ~$100k/yr loss, I think they could cover it. That's only 8k monthly $1 donations. Pretty sure they'd surpass it by a lot. And then they'd be accountable to users, too, not just advertisers.
anxiety
@Nurbs is there any particular thing that sets it off more than others, or something that originally happened? Or is it just like, background radiation?
@Nurbs oh, well in that case BOOP!
@Nurbs boop?
@treehat okay, I'm definitely buying you baguette ingredients, I'm just saying.
@MOOMANiBE Further evidence we actually live in a hell world.
Anyway, this will still be completely unusable for me as a platform until I can somehow sort people into columns (lists?)
I can't keep track of more than about 75-100 "main" follows at a time. I mean, follow them closely enough to be friends. I can add more, but I miss a lot of their stuff, and if it mixes in with my "friend" follows, they just get drowned out :(
I can't go to hell - I'm all out of vacation days.
Birds are good. Computers are bad. I'm too old for this.