i think someone on here posted this last night, but i'm still really digging the idea presented here that brutalist websites are meant to be function-first, looks-second (compared to how BrutalistWebsites dot Com describes brutalist websites, which to them means 'webpages with sometimes white backgrounds, black text, and a lot of them have wacky ui elements that make things unaccessible for a lot of people').
also i haven't tested it yet but i'm 90% sure (barring the too-new HTTPS protocol) this webpage will display near-flawlessly on Internet Explorer 5 on Windows 98