Confusion, pol-related (-~¿)
I'm not sure if I'm just seeing nazis everywhere, or if they are legitimately everywhere.
Or if I'm just on the wrong side of things, and they're on the right side.
re: Confusion, pol-related (-~¿)
@Phorm I'm not sure how that last even follows from the first.
re: Confusion, pol-related (-~¿)
Well, it's like this: The term is being used so much and so often that maybe my usage of it is incorrect. Maybe the people I see who I know others around here would refer to in that way, maybe they aren't ACTUALLY accurately described in that manner due to a difference of opinion.
Maybe I'm wrong, because there's so many of these people. They're everywhere - where I work, at the conventions I attend, online in every corner - That should be enough to stop and say "Hey, maybe I'm the problem".
re: Confusion, pol-related (-~¿)
@Phorm ...dipshittery being common doesn't make it not dipshittery. Hell all you need to prove that is the OG examples. Was Himmler not one because he has plenty of minions? :P
re: Confusion, pol-related (-~¿)
Pretty sure Himmler and his ilk are dead. I'm talking more about today.
re: Confusion, pol-related (-~¿)
@Phorm Doesn't change the example.
re: Confusion, pol-related (-~¿)
@Phorm Your point was "well there's lots of them so they might be right".
The 40s provide an example of lots of them still being wrong.
re: Confusion, pol-related (-~¿)
I'm not sure, though. They seem to be everywhere. All I'm saying it it gives cause for introspection. Maybe this echo chamber has warped me, because I presume it's always right. What if it isn't?
All I'm saying is that I've long since thought they deserve no consideration, but given the way the world is going, I really should.
re: Confusion, pol-related (-~¿)
@Doephin
I don't understand the point, I admit.