@Felthry Basically, it's me going through a construction process from another paper, except with an added layer on top of it, checking all the way through that the extra layer doesn't mess anything up.
Think of it like this: I'm a chemistry PhD, and I read a paper where the author(s) synthesized some weird new chemical that's simpler than but pretty similar to a chemical that *I* want to synthesize. So I repeat the process they did, except I added in some additional desirable (but unstable) functional group from the start, and I'm checking that the reactions still work all the way through.
Awoo.space is a Mastodon instance where members can rely on a team of moderators to help resolve conflict, and limits federation with other instances using a specific access list to minimize abuse.
While mature content is allowed here, we strongly believe in being able to choose to engage with content on your own terms, so please make sure to put mature and potentially sensitive content behind the CW feature with enough description that people know what it's about.
Before signing up, please read our community guidelines. While it's a very broad swath of topics it covers, please do your best! We believe that as long as you're putting forth genuine effort to limit harm you might cause – even if you haven't read the document – you'll be okay!
re: mathposting, foxposting
@Felthry Basically, it's me going through a construction process from another paper, except with an added layer on top of it, checking all the way through that the extra layer doesn't mess anything up.
Think of it like this: I'm a chemistry PhD, and I read a paper where the author(s) synthesized some weird new chemical that's simpler than but pretty similar to a chemical that *I* want to synthesize. So I repeat the process they did, except I added in some additional desirable (but unstable) functional group from the start, and I'm checking that the reactions still work all the way through.
Does that help?