what we did/do instead of relying on twitter blue checks
1. examine the profile information. find what correlations exist with websites and other accounts.
2. examine those websites and other accounts. see if there is any link *back* to the profile. (Mastodon's link checkmark system is very helpful here, as it checks for this backlink automatically.)
3. (for celebrities, major charities, etc.) search independently for confirmation via interviews, news articles, or the like that one or more of these accounts or websites are associated with the purported owner of the account.
sometimes all you get is relatively shaky evidence, but the thing about this process is that it does not rely on Twitter's blue checkmarks at all - and in the process you get a vibe for the entity's online presence that can answer other questions you may have.
and you don't get egg on your face because you thought that was really Christopher Walken on Twitter making the funny post.
- 🦊 🐱 (?)
Awoo.space is a Mastodon instance where members can rely on a team of moderators to help resolve conflict, and limits federation with other instances using a specific access list to minimize abuse.
While mature content is allowed here, we strongly believe in being able to choose to engage with content on your own terms, so please make sure to put mature and potentially sensitive content behind the CW feature with enough description that people know what it's about.
Before signing up, please read our community guidelines. While it's a very broad swath of topics it covers, please do your best! We believe that as long as you're putting forth genuine effort to limit harm you might cause – even if you haven't read the document – you'll be okay!
re: what we did/do instead of relying on twitter blue checks
@noiob ugggh, removing that support stinks