rambly, pol-abstract, nature, environmentalism, western spirituality
Like, we have the 17th century version of 'Nature as Mechanical' still embedded in our education system, and it becomes part of the secular spirituality of western thought even today
Like, we hold few things as sacrosanct and divine as preservation of the distinction between the Natural and the Human
Aligning your lifestyle with Natural Behaviours that will lead to wellbeing through a mechanistic, step-by-step process
Natural Remedies, All-Natural Ingredients
These are all Spiritual stances. (Spiritual does not equate to bad or wrong, but it is something we should accept, culturally)
By what criteria do we distinguish the natural behaviour of the Orangutan or Crow crafting a tool, and a Human crafting a tool? Which behaviour is natural?
If an animal made it, how is it unnatural?
The idea of ecosystems as clockwork mechanisms of perpetual stasis has become our primary argument against human destruction, despite all scientific proof pointing towards a far more nuanced model of constant change and adaptation.
If biomes were harmonious clockwork phenomena before humans came along, the anti-evolution movement would be entirely correct.
re: rambly, pol-abstract, western spirituality- [CW: Meta (anti-kin bs)]
This, among other things, is why
I'm F'n Laff
..At the idea that Western Spirituality had absolutely no connection to anything animalistic -> started appropriating it from other cultures -> kin happened.
Like, the people who say that? Get lernt, read a book and shut the hell up, you utter earspoons.