i think someone on here posted this last night, but i'm still really digging the idea presented here that brutalist websites are meant to be function-first, looks-second (compared to how BrutalistWebsites dot Com describes brutalist websites, which to them means 'webpages with sometimes white backgrounds, black text, and a lot of them have wacky ui elements that make things unaccessible for a lot of people').
re the 'wacky elements' thing: i would probably call those post-brutalist websites maybe? or neobrutalist? idk i dont really feel they fit in the brutalist umbrella although in all honesty i know almost nothing about architecture so who knows
Awoo.space is a Mastodon instance where members can rely on a team of moderators to help resolve conflict, and limits federation with other instances using a specific access list to minimize abuse.
While mature content is allowed here, we strongly believe in being able to choose to engage with content on your own terms, so please make sure to put mature and potentially sensitive content behind the CW feature with enough description that people know what it's about.
Before signing up, please read our community guidelines. While it's a very broad swath of topics it covers, please do your best! We believe that as long as you're putting forth genuine effort to limit harm you might cause – even if you haven't read the document – you'll be okay!