uspol followup followup followup
ANOTHER came at me. He said he'd "owned" me with a rebuttal after I'd blocked him, then proceeded to spam every comment I'd left in the last 24 hours with a challenge. After waiting all of an hour.
So I looked.
My original point? "Kavanaugh's own calendar didn't match up with his repeated perjury."
His ownage? This link. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/10/03/retired-fbi-agent-doj-lawyer-ms-monica-mclean-attended-kavanaugh-hearing-with-blasey-ford/
It "proves" Ford was lying because her lawyer friend was... standing kinda near her? No calendar mention at all.
re: uspol followup followup followup
@zebratron2084 yep. seriously, either they really do (to be *extremely* nice about it) have quite a bit of difficulty following any particular train of thought, or (far more likely) they're arguing in bad faith and using the same goalpost-moving, knee-jerk, "lol I win because you said a thing" tactics they always do, and in their shriveled rotten little hearts they know they lost a long damn time ago. :D
re: uspol followup followup followup
@troodon And if that accomplishes nothing more than making them think twice before they go to "pwn a libtard" with no real information... that's good enough for me.
The funny thing is, as much as I get accused of bullying myself, all it's EVER taken to stop a tiger charge is saying "Let's not do this, okay?" Or to concede a single one of my points, even if they disagree with all others. In all my years as a troll-hunter, not ONE has ever tried either one.
re: uspol followup followup followup
@zebratron2084 and truly, playing for the bleachers *is* the goal, and it *does* make a difference. there's plenty of thoughtful people in the audience, too intimidated or unsure to speak up, listening intently and coming to their own conclusions.