there really, really should be a "don't show me this one post, but don't block/mute the person" option
@Felthry you can mute posts/threads once they show up in your notifications, but you can't mute.. any post/thread arbitrarily
i have no idea why that limitation is there, except perhaps a deliberate design decision
but. i want to be able to mute any post yeah
@kit awoo runs the glitch.social fork yes... and does glitch _not_ run the fork named after it????
@Felthry dev.glitch.social runs glitch-soc. glitch.social runs mainline.
@kit that's confusing
@Felthry glitch.social came first and was a place for beta-testing mainline features when bea was contributing heavily to mainline development
dev.glitch.social came later when the glitch-soc fork was being first made, to host the new fork.
@Felthry glitch-soc is named after glitch.social, glitch.social is not named after glitch-soc
@kit also I always thought the branch was called glitch.social too
@Felthry but at any rate, awoo existed before glitch-soc and i had thought it was run by garg so. that's why i thought it ran mainline.
@kit awoo has always been run by crom, and afawk gargron doesn't like the philosophy of using a domain whitelist which is awoo's main draw
@Felthry i see. i never looked much into it, i just remember there being a lot of "i'm hosting a new instance for if you want whitelisting" talk
@Felthry glitch.social runs masto mainline? and you're on awoo anyway? (does awoo run the glitch-soc fork? which is not the same as glitch.social the instance)
in any case. i bring it up because people have been talking about wanting this for a long time