gamergate article on wikipedia
I think the summary is mostly excellent, but every few months I check back and it's a little more watered down.
Actual quote from the talk page from a person actively trying to water down the article:
"I'm not arguing that [gamergate's claims] aren't strongly refuted. I'm arguing that our goal should not be to refute them, but to present the argument."
We should present both sides without addressing whether or not the claims are true!
Awoo.space is a Mastodon instance where members can rely on a team of moderators to help resolve conflict, and limits federation with other instances using a specific access list to minimize abuse.
While mature content is allowed here, we strongly believe in being able to choose to engage with content on your own terms, so please make sure to put mature and potentially sensitive content behind the CW feature with enough description that people know what it's about.
Before signing up, please read our community guidelines. While it's a very broad swath of topics it covers, please do your best! We believe that as long as you're putting forth genuine effort to limit harm you might cause – even if you haven't read the document – you'll be okay!