US pol, birdsite
I don’t know what to make of this, but it seems maybe important: https://twitter.com/jack/status/923555837066412037
Specifically, $1.9mm seems like the largest number I’ve heard so far on what foreign actors spent on influence in the US in 2016. Twitter likes money, so I can’t imagine them making this decision out of the good will of their hearts.
So this is both a large number and anomalous for Twitter, and I’m curious what it means.
US pol, birdsite
@Goldkin ..... *huh*. yeah, that's... iiiiiiinteresting.
US pol, birdsite
Influence since* 2016, that is, assuming this is referencing FY2016 plus some projection on their part.