you can put it back up on maybe the 18th or so, but people are getting shameless these days and putting them back as soon as the the 13th or 14th. absolutely disgraceful
I'm gonna try to balance the joy of memeing with like, some reasonable level of also listening to people who have concrete, serious reasons for being glad she's dead. I hope everyone living in countries fucked over under her rule have at least 10x the joy I'm having as a random white Canadian who just kinda abstractly loves this
@SuricrasiaOnline your iceberg lead me indirectly to https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitsquatting
(false)
you've heard of /var/mail, but have you heard of /var/cash? fun fact: every unix account is also a credit account, you can see your "balance" in /var/cash. nowadays this doesn't mean anything, but back in the day it was used for billing people on big time-sharing servers. in order to discourage people from using too much memory, there would be an additional charge if a process owned by your account causes the system to run out of memory, commonly known as "OOM Fees"
re: tech kink gear
@HabitEXE obscure note: under the cover there are also screw terminals that break out the 4 twisted pairs, for... whatever purposes you may think of
re: boss baby crossover movie idea
@densetsunogomez "I told you to come alone, but I guess that was too hard. So try this - I'm gone."
grumpy linux question
i use debian with networkmanager on my laptop, and accidentally bump my rfkill button pretty often, taking out my wifi connection. i'd like to disable rfkill completely, and i can find no documentation on how to do so. i can't blacklist the rfkill kernel module because the bluetooth module uses it. it appears that userspace processes (wpa_supplicant and bluetoothd) take over management of rfkill (they have /dev/rfkill open), but they don't seem to have config options to disable it. i think there's some build options i can disable? am i seriously gonna have to compile my own kernel just to disable rfkill?
re: autistic text formatting survey
oh, maybe it's like, marking a reference as local rather than global. local to an individual relationship, to things friends commonly know about the speaker, or even a broader community reference. or possibly like, the field the discussion is happening under?
i think it often has a sort of ironic or self-deprecating tone because explicitly marking a reference's locality is a way of saying "ok when i say , i don't mean it the normal way, i mean it like, the Me Bullshit keyed to that phrase"
re: autistic text formatting survey
also, how do you describe what formatting like this is meant to convey? i've struggled to put it into words, maybe a textual equivalent to a wink or a knowing look or a significant glance? like, "this phrase has a non-literal meaning as a reference to some assumed-to-be shared knowledge", like, this piece of text is not a literal phrase but rather the name of an idea??
like
alice