Across several samples, furries and non-furries did not significantly differ from one another on measures of life satisfaction and self-esteem. Furries did not differ with regard to their self reports of physical health, psychological health, or the quality of their relationships, and were actually more likely to have a stable and coherent sense of identity than non-furries.
It’s worth noting that this lack of difference in well-being occurs despite the fact that most furries
have a history of significant bullying.
re: Furry surveys research conclusions.
There were also a number of issues in which men felt greater distress than women—men reported feeling a greater need to hide aspects of their identity around furries, felt more pressured into romantic relationships from other furries, and felt more uncomfortable around other furries than women.
The pressured into relationships thing is pretty interesting. I'm not gonna make claims about the exact sociology here but I'm sure y'all can make some guesses.
re: Furry surveys research conclusions.
Okay that's the end of the mega-paper.
There's a TON in here that's interesting but I didn't get into.
relinking:
PDF: https://furscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Fur-Science-Final-pdf-for-Website_2017_10_18.pdf
Browsable: https://furscience.com/research-findings/
re: Furry surveys research conclusions.
While we did find preliminary evidence that members of the furry fandom reported slightly more homosexual orientations in Wave 2 as compared to Wave 1 (3.81 / 7.00 vs. 3.55 / 7.00, t(92) = 2.03, p = .045), the effect fell to non-significance when we statistically controlled for participant age (F(1,91) = 1.64, p = .20). These findings are preliminary, but may suggest that while homosexuality is more prevalent in older members of the fandom, the effect of spending time in the fandom on sexual orientation may, at most, be a small.
HUHHH.
@faynefluff yep this is the aggregation of a whole bunch of different studies including several ACs.