Oh hey, I think this is the one place I haven't posted this yet. Here's what I'm planning to vote for in the 2018 CA elections. https://medium.com/@ftl_ftw/what-im-thinking-of-voting-for-8f0860b7b78d
re: Politics
@WokenClick I was going to argue, but then I read the article and 100% agree with it.
I do think the image you pulled out isn't the key summary of that piece, though. Not sure what is, it's a good article that's hard to summarize in a soundbite...
Never forget: most of us have been poisoned by a toxic educational system that teaches us systematically that failing at a task or not knowing a correct answer is shameful.
There is no inherent shame in failure, in not knowing, or in being wrong, and we shouldn't actively shame others for it.
Get back up, learn something new, and try again.
@jskellogg@tabletop.social @dapperbear are you sure the uni would be a noticeable negative? IMO, people would mostly skip over the university if its not some big name. If you skip it people will assume you have no degree.
“The Bezos way: sleep, puttering, and three high-quality decisions a day” https://m.signalvnoise.com/the-bezos-way-sleep-puttering-and-three-high-quality-decisions-a-day-8c86505df06e
Made my first very own #crochet pattern! And of course, it's as geeky as I am :p
I've always loved the way that ethanol looks like a little creature, so I made an amigurumi version - because why not? Meet Ethan, the cuddly creature that gets you drunk!
Should I continue doing this? There's loads of chemical compounds that have a fun structure to make :)
Not all debates are intellectually honest ones to have
If you come in swinging, saying something like "Academics won't let you question whether smoking causes lung cancer"
Maybe that's because the question has been debated, at the highest level, for decades, and the answers and level of confidence are so accessible that even a small amount of research would uncover them
So you're either a boring contrarian who needs to go to the library or you're politically motivated and dishonest
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
For those that came out for #NationalComingOutDay : you're valid.
For those who couldn't, for whatever reason: you're valid too.
re: US pol
@FinnyLion Calfornia's had that primary system for a decade now, and it hasn't resulted in non-two-party candidates having more of a chance as far as I can tell. We don't have a single non-D-or-R state or congressional legislator.
Parties can't agree to put forth one candidate, because picking which candidate for a party to put forth is *exactly the point of a primary* which is what was turned in to an open non-partisan first round.
re: US pol
@FinnyLion A simpler case. Six candidates in a swing district. If there's two republicans and four democrats: final election may well be between two republicans. If there's two democrats and four republicans: final election might be two democrats.
Basically, it STILL plays out like having two separate primaries, (D/R) where each voter is only "really" choosing between the candidates of "their" party, except then you mash together the vote totals and see which side split votes least.
Data Scientist in the bay. Tennis player (4.5). D&D, Gloomhaven, and board game enthusiast. Pronouns he/him.