Code
Anyways apparently `for x in $(echo "a b c")` is NOT equivalent to `for x in "a b c"`
I am Upset
re: Code
@socks wait, which of the two behaviors do you want?
re: Code
@socks fwiw:
% for x in a b c; do echo "x: $x"; done
x: a
x: b
x: c
and
% for x in "$(echo "a b c")"; do echo "x: $x"; done
x: a b c
re: Code
@noiob What. That's opposite from mine (Bash)
And I want the first one
re: Code
@socks it's different code from yours, yours works the same for me (zsh)
re: Code
@noiob Oh so it is. Yeah I hate all of this
re: Code
@socks yeah that's usually my reaction after writing three lines of bash
re: Code
@noiob
```
[emi@cyrus ~]$ for x in $(echo "a b c"); do echo "x: $x"; done
x: a
x: b
x: c
[emi@cyrus ~]$ for x in "a b c"; do echo "x: $x"; done
x: a b c
```
It doesn't look like `-n` changes anything