eidolon @shaderphantom@awoo.space
- Pronouns
- they/he
has poor taste in video games
yes you can follow request
please ask in a DM for discord/other app to contact me directly. DMs here are not a great direct medium
avatar by @pinnapop@twitter.com
Joined Jun 2017
I really love that you can literally build anything out of random planes in Quake and it will not look entirely out of place for the game.
Sure love that my executive dysfunction stopped me from properly pre-treating my lawn last fall and now I'm suffering for it 
@trysdyn YEAH that was me lmao. sorry for jetting so quick and not really introducing myself!
@trysdyn I just waited in the stream room for a bit after the show! it didn't take long to get an elevator after the initial rush, at least for the south tower...
eidolon
boosted
Grump-post about people complaining about the dollar-impact of GDQ
There's a lot of hand-wringing over how GDQ isn't as efficient as directly contributing to a charity and that somehow makes it problematic. That's completely incorrect.
You can always donate to its supported charity directly if you feel so, but at the end of the day it doesn't matter: those dollars from the charity's marketing budget are still going to GDQ because they get returned 15-20 fold.
GDQ also does not skim anything from donations; 100% of the donations go to the charity. It's completely funded up front by a combination of reg fees and the charity's marketing budget.
If it wasn't GDQ, those dollars would go somewhere else for marketing; that's the point of a marketing budget. And whatever else it went to would probably not have the same ROI as GDQ.
So this thought that GDQ being involved in the pipe reduces the dollar impact is only true in-so-far as some expense is taken to make GDQ happen. However the $1 you give goes 100% to the charity and the GDQ funding comes from a budget exclusive FOR driving more donations and without it, the $3.13m we saw from AGDQ 2020 would have never happened.
What do you want here? GDQ somehow happen at its scale for free? That the attendees contribute more than the fifth of a million they did to make it happen?
Sigh.
You can always donate to its supported charity directly if you feel so, but at the end of the day it doesn't matter: those dollars from the charity's marketing budget are still going to GDQ because they get returned 15-20 fold.
GDQ also does not skim anything from donations; 100% of the donations go to the charity. It's completely funded up front by a combination of reg fees and the charity's marketing budget.
If it wasn't GDQ, those dollars would go somewhere else for marketing; that's the point of a marketing budget. And whatever else it went to would probably not have the same ROI as GDQ.
So this thought that GDQ being involved in the pipe reduces the dollar impact is only true in-so-far as some expense is taken to make GDQ happen. However the $1 you give goes 100% to the charity and the GDQ funding comes from a budget exclusive FOR driving more donations and without it, the $3.13m we saw from AGDQ 2020 would have never happened.
What do you want here? GDQ somehow happen at its scale for free? That the attendees contribute more than the fifth of a million they did to make it happen?
Sigh.
Oh god, it's worse than last year. So much worse. I gotta nip this in the bud (literally), but it's kinda rainy and gross outside so I can't 2,4D it all to hell.
@Duende@snouts.online so many dicks...
We're not even halfway through January and the winter broadleaf weeds are already popping up everywhere because of the summer drought. Help me
bird can have little a pizza
Might fuck around and drink a lot of water
@Duende@snouts.online thank you
re: activitypub vs capitalism
@multiple_creatures this is an important feature of apub's technical design for freedom on the network, and I think makes it stand out from Twitter et al. So it's important to make the distinction for the particular problem being addressed.
re: activitypub vs capitalism
@multiple_creatures I think this is an issue only for access points to federation that act like social networks. There's not a lot of precedent for it yet, but there are legitimate use cases for publishing actors to act more like RSS feed sources, e.g. an artist no longer has to be beholden to a Mastodon instance and can instead self host their own art blog accessible from any other access point, federating their own website instead.
eidolon
boosted
@grainloom unless you use zsnes
re: doom 2016
@monorail I'm pretty sure Samuel Hayden lied about many things all things considered
@noiob that is @ottdogbuns@snouts.online
eidolon
boosted
It’s a god-forsaken dinnertime in the plaza, and you are a horrible goose.
It's not on stream anymore but they're playing Weight of the World in the stream room #AGDQ2020
- Pronouns
- they/he
has poor taste in video games
yes you can follow request
please ask in a DM for discord/other app to contact me directly. DMs here are not a great direct medium
avatar by @pinnapop@twitter.com
Joined Jun 2017
