@bleak both of those and more!
@vahnj tell me more
@bleak well there's the fairy type which has three different derivations but each ultimately do similar things-
they're kind of like invisible chore people who resemble small children and get offended kind of easily
their types are kind of based on where they show up
then there's the D&D ones which was originally more of a "scaled dog"! D&D decided to make them more lizardy, effectively to relate them to dragons!
Japan loved kobolds too and decided they were dogs so, they're dogs too.
@bleak I'm not at all biased because of the latest expansion having a kobold baby you take care of and avenge the death of his parents or anything :X
@vahnj wait what does mining have to do with their germanic roots
@bleak one of the kobolds represented is associated with mines and is often portrayed as a sooty, hunched over child
@vahnj i'm not seeing the connection between that and germanic
@bleak gygax basically just focused on one aspect of kobolds and it became its own thing, that's about it
@vahnj OHHH the kobold myth originated in germany. i was like "what? are the germans well known for their mining prowess or something?"
@bleak yea! sorry i didn't explain that part super well
@bleak Because of the Germanic roots though a lot of kobolds revolve around mining. D&D took it in the right direction of also making them very proficient in traps as this is a very fairy kobold trait. Dogbolds do not usually bear this trait, they're really just anthro dogs in most cases.
I really like Suioden's kobolds though. They're basically battle-ready elves in that and they're cute as heck :O