re: genderpol, Birdsite, thirsty idiots, chasers, incredibly bad takes
@hystericempress Haha, yes, I've seen it. That dude has PROBLEMS...
re: genderpol, Birdsite, thirsty idiots, chasers, incredibly bad takes
@zebratron2084 it's 'justified' with a set of talking points about how 'in nature most predators are female,' which is A) dubiously scientific, and B) kind of really weird to be hung-up on for a fantasy involving people unhinging their jaws to eat other people.
re: genderpol, Birdsite, thirsty idiots, chasers, incredibly bad takes
@hystericempress @zebratron2084 Even better is that the mod itself is apparently loaded with killswitches that will trigger if you even attempt to force it to function with any male PC characters.
re: genderpol, Birdsite, thirsty idiots, chasers, incredibly bad takes
@hystericempress Holy. Fuck. Well, that shoots down the comment I was about to make... which was that this is all really shredding my last bit of doubt in Poe's Law. I really could not make up my mind if this was someone's really deadpan satire/prank or not, because that digression into "communism" seemed just a little too much on the nose.
But... yeah. That does not sound like the activity of somebody with a sense of humor. Not humor as we know it. Not... humor... as... we... know... it... </torgo_theme>
re: genderpol, Birdsite, thirsty idiots, chasers, incredibly bad takes
@zebratron2084 Yeah, I did some extra digging; he is apparently responsible for the infamously sketchy vore mod for Skyrim(yes, really) where he was similarly dogmatic about "WOMEN ONLY." apparently in the non-furry vore community there is a super hardcore movement of people who insist on only women engaging in vore, which they claim isn't because they're het*.
*it is because they're het