so, we may have found our first moon orbiting another planet? advances.sciencemag.org/lens/a

it isn't confirmed yet (much like between the first detection of an exoplanet {1988} and the first confirmed one {1992, or '95 if we're talking main sequence stars}, this'll take years), but the evidence so far is well in favor of the object in question being a moon instead of a planet and honestly I'm excited as hell for this?

sure it's literally the easiest possible object to find of its type (a neptune-sized gas giant orbiting a superjovian at a great distance), but the fact that we've found something like this at all is kind of amazing

also it's a fucking -small gas giant orbiting another, larger gas giant-. that may very well have formed in place. if that's confirmed that bodes super well for finding like, actual habitable moons around gas giants in the future

@Thaminga a gas giant orbiting a gas giant, I wonder if the smaller one also has moons and if so just how deep orbital mechanics will physically let you go. Moons orbiting moons orbiting moons.

@Felthry I could definitely see four steps down happening (massive, almost-brown-dwarf gas giant -> small gas giant -> Mars-sized rocky moon -> tiny asteroidlike moonlet), though that would take a pretty huge system to really work out and sheer luck to actually like, exist

maybe around like, a type A or B star

@Thaminga Go one step further by having the biggest gas giant orbit the distal star of a binary star system

Follow

@Thaminga oh, of course!

Then put a space station in orbit around the smallest mini-moon, because hey, why not, maybe some aliens live on this world that surely has some _really weird_ weather conditions

@Felthry orbits like that won't affect weather conditions too much, I don't think!

now, astronomical events though? yeah those are going to be all sorts of fucked up

@Thaminga I mean, the sun would be periodically eclipsed by one of several larger bodies, I feel like that would do _something_ to the weather

@Thaminga Unless you somehow manage to have the planetary system at a very high inclination, but that's even _more_ improbable

@Felthry There'd definitely be some level of inclination at least, but yeah; eclipses like this don't actually last for long enough to affect the overall weather patterns too greatly!

@Thaminga A very high inclination is quite improbable though!

I wonder what it'd take to get a planet with a moon orbiting at near-90° inclination... it'd almost certainly have to be a captured asteroid or Oort cloud object, maybe even an extrasolar asteroid

@Felthry I didn't say high, but even low inclinations will radically decrease your chances of an eclipse; an object orbiting Neptune at the same distance the Moon has from Earth would already move three planetary radii above and below the planet at an inclination of only 10°; while this is high for regularly formed moons, remember that this is with respect to the -orbit-, and regular moons are typically coplanar with their planets' rotation axes (which can be well, anything).

@Thaminga Oh, good point. I didn't think about planets with highly inclined rotation axes.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Awoo Space

Awoo.space is a Mastodon instance where members can rely on a team of moderators to help resolve conflict, and limits federation with other instances using a specific access list to minimize abuse.

While mature content is allowed here, we strongly believe in being able to choose to engage with content on your own terms, so please make sure to put mature and potentially sensitive content behind the CW feature with enough description that people know what it's about.

Before signing up, please read our community guidelines. While it's a very broad swath of topics it covers, please do your best! We believe that as long as you're putting forth genuine effort to limit harm you might cause – even if you haven't read the document – you'll be okay!