i just realized this processor spec has no way to jump purely based on equality, only greater-or-equal and less-than

i mean i guess you can simulate not-equal by doing one and then doing the other and anything that comes after assumes the value isn't equal

but

@typhlosion there's seriously no "branch when the zero flag is set"??

@Fuego i, uh,

[runs away]

@typhlosion *still yelling* HOW DO YOU CHECK FOR GTE AND LT??! WHAT ALU FLAGS DO YOU EVEN SUPPORT?

@Fuego pls ;-;

@typhlosion shhh shhh *cuddles* it'll be okay... *pets you gently* *holds you tightly* *whispers* seriously though, what flags are in your flags register...

@Fuego i don't have a flags register - it's based vaguely on MIPS, which also doesn't have a flags register

@typhlosion ok but like the mips ALU still passes you back at least carry, overflow, and zero... its okay. It was a hobby. And you're cute. So I wont do anything hasty.

@Fuego i mean the jump opcode still has plenty of opcodes paired with it that are as yet invalid; i could stuff a jez in there

@Fuego i mean. sub-opcodes.

@Fuego okay what i really mean is that the first hexit of an (always 16-bit) instruction is the opcode; some instructions treat the last hexit as a sub-opcode so i can get more instructions in there that only need two register parameters or such