The only reason we think of causality as moving forward in time is that we subjectively experience time as flowing in that particular direction.

There's no a prori reason to say that event A causes later event B. It's equally logically possible that B is causing A.

Really though I find it more meaningful to say that directional causality is a hoax and time is a static series of connected relationships.

@starkatt I typically stand with Kant here: time, space, causality, etc are all necessary preconditions on our experiences, filters that we cannot perceive the world without

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Awoo Space

Awoo.space is a Mastodon instance where members can rely on a team of moderators to help resolve conflict, and limits federation with other instances using a specific access list to minimize abuse.

While mature content is allowed here, we strongly believe in being able to choose to engage with content on your own terms, so please make sure to put mature and potentially sensitive content behind the CW feature with enough description that people know what it's about.

Before signing up, please read our community guidelines. While it's a very broad swath of topics it covers, please do your best! We believe that as long as you're putting forth genuine effort to limit harm you might cause – even if you haven't read the document – you'll be okay!