it's SBC, meh. Would be really nice if they supported some low-latency protocol, or even just LDAC

still, god this is convenient

@noiob Bluetooth audio is a mess, so I don't blame them for sticking to SBC, although I guess they could've added AAC, they likely already have a license

They aren't going to get an LDAC license from Sony, or aptX from Qualcomm

Also, fun fact, in practice the implementations are so garbage that low latency codecs end up with almost the same latency, at least that's the case on Android devices

Follow

@ChlorideCull are you sure LDAC requires a license? it's in Linux and AOSP

· · Web · 1 · 0 · 0

@noiob hm, okay, yeah it seems that they only charge money for sinks (so headphones) but not sources

still, because of the oddball infrastructure on the switch they would need to implement it themselves, which is a hard sell, considering how limited implementations are

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Awoo Space

Awoo.space is a Mastodon instance where members can rely on a team of moderators to help resolve conflict, and limits federation with other instances using a specific access list to minimize abuse.

While mature content is allowed here, we strongly believe in being able to choose to engage with content on your own terms, so please make sure to put mature and potentially sensitive content behind the CW feature with enough description that people know what it's about.

Before signing up, please read our community guidelines. While it's a very broad swath of topics it covers, please do your best! We believe that as long as you're putting forth genuine effort to limit harm you might cause – even if you haven't read the document – you'll be okay!