the Hearth @Felthry@awoo.space

well this is an unfortunate tie... counting a vote from a friend not on here it's a three-way tie! now what do we do
-F

what does the fediverse recommend (out of the ones we're leaning towards)?
-F

we have... a Dilemma

we backed this thing on kickstarter: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/theroguez/foxfox-vinyl-figure/description
to get a single figure

and now we need to decide which figure to get! the options are all so good
-F

Ramen spectroscopy
-F

*radiates appreciation for theriomorphic friends*
-F

and as we understand it, their motorcycles are considered pretty good too, though we don't know a lot about motorcycles
-F

Yamaha is such a strange company... because they make motorcycles, they make integrated circuits, they make pianos (including some really well-regarded grand pianos),
-F

who had the best battle music?

​

it really is such a shame that Konami abruptly ceased to exist

they made such good games
-F

I think I've come to realize that my ideal genital configuration is simply nothing. I've never felt quite right with either a vagina or a dick, and when Felthry got to thinking about null taurs yesterday I latched onto the idea quite strongly.

So I suppose, from now until something changes, I'm going to be null.

-R

you ever just plug in a pickle
-F

still think this is one of my best posts
-F

sputtering is a wonderfully evocative word
-F

do you prefer your pasta

we tend to think of oxides as insulative, which makes tin dioxide *really weird*
-F

but in cases like, say, astronomy, you might think of copernicus or galileo as founders, and both of them were wrong about a bunch of stuff but they were also right about a bunch of stuff

and newtonian mechanics (n.b.: newton's laws were probably stolen from hooke, but newton gets credit anyway because history) is still perfectly valid when not dealing with exceptional situations
-F

maybe medicine in the broader sense, looking at Galen as the "founder" and very little of his work has any actual scientific merit as we understand
-F

I wonder if there's any field other than psychology that has a prominent historical figure seen as the field's founder, but also whose every word on the topic is generally regarded by those in the field as pretty much just plain wrong
-F