actually along those lines "William Schwenk Gilbert" and "Arthur Sullivan" sound very stereotypical too. Like Sullivan would be this serious gentleman's gentleman who was Gilbert's batsman during the Great War, and they'd solve murders in absolutely beautiful countryside in the 1920s.
@chimerror Thanks! Useful to have any and all feedback, I don't think I'd seen that graph though I remember another with art skill plateauing/rocketing forwards.
@LexYeen Thanks! Useful to have anything more as input, here.
@Tuftears Huh - thanks for helping on this one!
@Chip_Unicorn Thanks! I'm currently seeing EVERYTHING I don't like about this... but there's some of it I do like, hence the thinking about art stuff just now.
and if that's true, by definition most times I thought I sucked big red baboon ass I was actually doing okay, but just uncovered another procedural thing.
had this thought/realization about art progress;
what if, in order to spot some problems, you have to get to a satisfactory stage with your last set of problems? Since you're trying to tackle literally an entire world, you still have some of the same issues say 1, 5, 20 years in, but you hadn't and couldn't spot them before?
That'd explain the cyclical appearance of This Sucks => Okay Now This Looks Okay => This Rocks (several tech aspects come together) => This Sucks (next issues spotted)
Tonight’s #drawing, trying to do one of those powerful NPCs the Realms are full of, crossed with the villains with tamed bears in a Fafhrd and the Grey Mouser story. Idk, I’m happy about some of this, unhappy about other parts.
#subpost Vidal Gaboon, a fancy line of scale-care and styling products
@Tuftears oh wow, that's awesome! Thanks!
@Tuftears slightly off topic, clicking on Wikipedia's listing really drives home how relatively recently Journey of the West was written by comparison to when Xuanzang roadtripped to India and back. Also, I hadn't realized that rather than being over a big spread of time like the events they describe, most of the "great Chinese novels" are solidly Ming dynasty, which really jams home how prosperous they were for a while.
re: uspol adjacent
@chimerror I figure Dems work the same way because the party's trying to sell something and everyone's relatively similar when it comes to selling/being sold to, BUT
the whole problem really compounds because at this point Dems CAN'T have as strong and unified a message as the enemy. We were always obliged to suck up to the rich, it's gotten so much worse thanks to Citizens United in particular, and how we're now the party of everyone NOT actively Christian nationalist/white supremacist means there are now right wing voters for right wing politicians to woo.
We always had the marketing problem of being basically Pepsi or Denny's, and now it's far worse. "We Republicans will bring America back to the prosperity and moral strength we enjoyed in [fictional therefore unquestionable] version of the 1950s" is a strong message by comparison to "We Democrats don't actively hate the environment, minorities, public education and poor people."
Lots of random gunk, but some drawings and cooking talk too. Obsesses about DnD and related topics. Left-leaning/profoundly frustrated politics. Black lives matter; trans rights are human rights.
Occasionally NSFW art and discussion, please do follow if you're 18+.