Aiun @Linael@awoo.space

*goes giantess and sits on federation* oops I broke it,

@Oneironott aah dang
this has a power. thank you. <3

(This is for situations where you would normally reply if you disagreed with the whole thing, to be clear.)

I mean, you *can*, it's just not *required.* Unless one of those 6 is racist or some shit like that, but it's not dishonesty if you just let it go.

I think "you don't *have* to argue with a list if you agree with 44 out of 50 of the bullet points but dispute 6" is a lesson that helped me

Meetup gave me a notification about "2 new comments"; mine, and the one I replied to. The notification took an hour to spin up

@blackle@dev.glitch.social (Incidentally that kind of book is a large part of why I didn't become a programmer much earlier; I went into it with no experience and had trouble with pointers, and thought that meant I was just bad at programming forever because I didn't get it in enough Days

it was only years later that I found out my learning curve was actually typical)

So apparently locking accounts doesn't stop you from making public tweets here, it's just follower control? Cool, I'll do it then.

@Gaypow @vahnj this is just absolutely fantastic and a comfort
I identify so much

I never have any idea what to say on awoo, but that's okay
Because I come here more to get away from twitter Mandatory Discussion Topics, and that's enough
just cultivate a little shared-world, and breathe

how do you say keikaku in sindarin

@Oneironott aaa

@masklayer http://www.yhchang.com/SAMSUNG_MEANS_TO_COME.html

if i had gotten the chance to explain this we might have come to a better understanding, less heat more light? oh, well, next time

(my infallibility take -- god is "infallible" in the same way gravity is, but is not a person; you can channel the divine but it's not a two-way binding. it's like filling up a container -- it fulfills the potential of the container, but the container is *still there*)

like no. jesus was not "testing" people every time he did something shitty aaaaaugh

it's not fair for me to get mad at someone for not understanding my thelema-ass mantling conception of christ, but it *is* fair for me to disagree that a guy is "timeless" and "infallible" when he sided with the slave masters over the slaves

augh so. whenever (it's rare) that i have a discussion about christianity/jesus/etc with a mainstream conventional christian it's just filled with their complicating assumptions based on nothing -- it's like some enterprise software form of religion