@qyliss Privacy, safety, and a constant rollout of untested features are my biggest complaints with twitter, so awoo.space's approach fits my needs more than mastodon.social does. Other people feel differently, and that's totally valid!
@qyliss Finally, mastodon.social is pretty much constantly updated, and since there isn't a staging server, many changes are tested live. awoo.space updates periodically, so it lags on updates but also tends to be more stable as a result.
@qyliss Similarly, awoo.space is intentionally and proactively moderated in a way that mastodon.social is not. You can find information about that here: https://awoo.space/about/more
@qyliss A few things! Awoo.space has a different federation policy; while mastodon.social has a blacklist approach (federate by default, blacklist known bad actors), awoo.space has a whitelist of instances it federates to. The intent is to focus on safety and privacy first and foremost.
@logoninternet Good! Dog!!
@ThatDamnCat I have a pretty diverse set of followers on Twitter, and not all those circles overlap. Community in-jokes aren't mutually comprehensible to my whole sphere over there!
@er1n That's... possible??
@ticky Hmm, yeah. Not sure. It might be only available from the "remote follow" UI, rather than via the search bar?
@ticky It wouldn't block you, to my understanding of how federation works; your awoos would be delivered to anyone who follows you, and you would receive mentions from anyone who follows you.
@ticky And to be honest, after having seen enough jerks on other instances in the rest of the fediverse, federating solely to mastodon.social is attractive to me! I know that's maybe not a good thing in the long haul but I genuinely see it as a feature and not a bug. I like Mastodon when it's less stressful than Twitter, and an intentional and cautious approach to federation is one of the things that makes it that way.
Sleepy but powerful