@vahnj Yeah they are. Yay, the 90's, when that was apparently a super-okay thing to do. >.<
@vahnj (And we were all so desperate for 'representative' media that we ate it up anyway. Uuuugh)
@indi i don't know how to feel about it
maybe it *was* ok to do, and it stands as an example of what *not* to do now
but i don't know
@vahnj That's how I look at it (and, e.g. Priscilla, Queen of the Desert, same thing, years earlier, not to mention RHPS)
Like, you have to view all these things in context, and accept that they were helpful for folks at the time, but at the same time is has to be okay for them to be UNHELPFUL for folks now.
Context is everything. The more context the better.
Let There Be Lips
@indi @vahnj @anthracite This is something I feel like I have to remind myself and others. RHPS was part of my introduction to queer culture. I saw it first when I was a teenager and it was not only enlightened but transgressive. I feel like we've lost the means to contextualize history. I never hear about how progressive things were then, only how problematic they are now. Only ideal praxis counts, and only until culture shifts.
Let There Be Lips
@vahnj @indi @anthracite Oh, heavens no, there's no _requirement_ on any of this. No content should be considered "gatekeeping" and nobody should be considered in or out based on their appreciation of any particular piece of media. I'm personally more focused about the "out" because I've seen too many people excluded for liking things others had declared anathema, but "in" is equally an issue for folks who've been pressured to enjoy things they found uncomfortable.
Let There Be Lips
@literorrery @anthracite @indi it's important to learn to enjoy content that is problematic but historical
but that does not also mean it's a requirement to be a part of the queer community
bottom life for me is sometimes it's good to tell people: it's ok to like problematic things