my "depressing" view of sentience
@Fuego I think about this a lot, too... and I'm not sold on it entirely, but it's definitely an interesting perspective.
I think we're capable of elevating ourselves from that line of thought-- but I would also argue that there are many levels of "sentience."
The animal levels range from instant reaction without thought to considering consequences before acting; The human levels are far more diverse but always chained to emotion and previous experience.
sentience, free will, etc
@mawr I think sentience is an illusion and "free will" is the qualia of running over a part of your brain grooves that isnt quite so deep as the ones you're used to.
sentience, free will, etc
@Fuego Hmm! That's an interesting theory.
sentience, free will, etc
sentience, free will, etc
@literorrery @mawr yes yes yes yes. Push the probability of a given behavior, and then a set of given possible rationalizations. Change subtly the dopamine squirt from an ingrained reaction up or down.
sentience, free will, etc
@literorrery @Fuego Huh! I always thought of magic as reaching outward as opposed to inward. That... could explain a few things.
sentience, free will, etc
@Fuego This begs the question of what true sentience is in that construct; the absence of influence from emotion & personal experience?
I'm convinced that "free will" is something we only exercise meaningfully approximately once or twice a week in those moments in which our routines break down... but must one have and exercise free will to be considered truly sentient? Is any form of routine a burden to that concept?
I have no answers; just things to consider.