snark 

There's sort of a nightmarish beauty in reading an argument that's immune to rebuttal due to sheer syntactical incoherency. Not just "incoherent" in the base sense of "makes no moral sense in my world," but literally just so poorly written you can not actually figure out what they're trying to say, let alone debate it.

It takes a certain... anti-skill to craft such things. A truly fine example can be marvelous in its craft, much the same as the aposematic markings on a toxic animal.

Follow

snark 

(standard disclaimer: it sure as hell wasn't any of you people -- i had to go pretty far afield on masto to find this specimen)

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Awoo Space

Awoo.space is a Mastodon instance where members can rely on a team of moderators to help resolve conflict, and limits federation with other instances using a specific access list to minimize abuse.

While mature content is allowed here, we strongly believe in being able to choose to engage with content on your own terms, so please make sure to put mature and potentially sensitive content behind the CW feature with enough description that people know what it's about.

Before signing up, please read our community guidelines. While it's a very broad swath of topics it covers, please do your best! We believe that as long as you're putting forth genuine effort to limit harm you might cause – even if you haven't read the document – you'll be okay!