snark
There's sort of a nightmarish beauty in reading an argument that's immune to rebuttal due to sheer syntactical incoherency. Not just "incoherent" in the base sense of "makes no moral sense in my world," but literally just so poorly written you can not actually figure out what they're trying to say, let alone debate it.
It takes a certain... anti-skill to craft such things. A truly fine example can be marvelous in its craft, much the same as the aposematic markings on a toxic animal.
snark
@zebratron2084 "WHY ARE YOU NOT FLIPPING THE TORTOISE OVER"
snark
@zebratron2084 Ah yes, the "not even wrong" type of argument.
snark
@Thaminga Far as I'm concerned, that whole concept was Pauli's greatest gift to humanity.
snark
(standard disclaimer: it sure as hell wasn't any of you people -- i had to go pretty far afield on masto to find this specimen)