seriously can someone tell me if i'm just missing something here and their argument makes sense?
social interaction is hard, baffling interaction with someone in a group chat
someone said something about "unicode in the 70s" and i attempted to politely point out that unicode didn't exist until 1987 at the earliest and then they started arguing, saying what i can only interpret as that because unicode intends to represent all human writing that all human writing can be considered to fall under the umbrella term unicode and just
no??? ??? ??????
when i try to explain the fact that unicode is a specific entity that did not exist before the late 80s they respond by saying i'm focusing too much on the coding and engineering side of things and ignoring the linguistics and humanities and just
that's a non-sequitur right?? i'm not missing something here????
also not sure why it said this since we're on the latest version of waterfox. maybe it's a version or two behind firefox or something
Seems people mostly agree that the o is /oʊ/ or /oː/, but there's disagreement on whether the l is /l/ or /ɫ/. Interesting!
re: ph-
the worst part is there's stuff we absolutely need to do today that we can't because of this
Plural system of three, Felthry, Alaric and Rosemary. We'll sign posts with a -F, -A, or -R.
Autistic, 20-something, anxious mess
Please introduce yourself before sending a follow request.
#FelthrysVGMSelection for my music picks.
Current avatar by @hi_cial