@literorrery @catterfly
00101110
00101110
00101110
00100000
01110111
01100101
01101100
01101100
00100000
01100100
01101111
01101110
01100101

@typhlosion @catterfly I helped run SNAP 5 (simulcast as http://www.bayareanightgame.org/index.php/Bang_22_-_Mobius_Research) in Seattle and aided with the Amazon Intern Game for two years (Amazon Cloud Control and Amazon Yesterday); this stuff is candy to me. =n.n=

@literorrery @typhlosion aaaaaaaaaa jfc i wish i could've partaken...... i love ciphers and args and web-based args....... i still tussle with The Dark Room every once in a while *shakes fist*

@literorrery @catterfly
''.join(map((lambda x:"boi"[-~x:(not x)<<1:((not x)<<1)-1]+''.join(chr(ord(c)+0x1d) for c in "EQI XUVXFODHWV"[x::2])),[0,not 0]))

@literorrery 01100100 01100110 01101100 01101011 01100111 01101010 01100110 00100000 01110010 01100101 01100011 01110101 01110010 01110011 01101001 01110110 01100101 00100001 00100001 00100001 00100001 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01100100 01110111 01100101 01100101 01100010 00101110 00100000 00111011 01000100

@catterfly Dweeb status confirmed. =n.n=

@catterfly ... and I only just noticed, even though you got it anyway, that I didn't hint this right because it didn't end in the == that would have made the encoding scheme spottable from the outside, so it just looks like a wall of noise. Sorry about!

@literorrery oh! base32 is all caps, base64 has caps and lowercase :3c (and also usually ends in == haha)

@literorrery @catterfly I got it immediately because it looked pretty solidly like Base64 anyway

the recursion was a nice touch