Josh is still awake.
It is 3:30 am in Albuquerque.
He is supposed to go and make sure that the hardware and stuff we made is working with the client at 8:30am.
I kept bugging him to let me know if he needed any help, but he insisted he didn't and I thought he was asleep when I woke up.
The stuff looks good though, we made an interactive kiosk for a local food bank to let them show off something shiny during their 'give us money' fundraiser tomorrow
@zatnosk but first we have to add a little speaker that goes 'pew pew!' every time the laser is on.
@zatnosk no, it is a pretty weak laser by itself, but that is a good idea.
@gamehawk speed holes.
Somehow.
@tom you really need to get your houses ground wire checked out.
and yes, I am working on what is an explicitly fragmented network. That is a feature, not a bug
@SoniEx2 I have absolutely no problem with i2p in terms of what it is trying to be, it is just not suitable for my purposes.
@SoniEx2 I am using a lot of the same ideas, but there are some things about using TCP that are too restrictive for what I want to do.
I study distributed networks and cognitive radio, I am working on making a mixed mode network and concerns that have to do with different transport layer technologies and things like ultrahigh latency networks make a global solution like i2p difficult to use.
I am going to have to write my own dht implementation eventually.
Many of the problem with DHT-based things seem to be solvable by just not having a global DHT.
But so far I haven't figured out how to add a way to filter who can join with existing dht implementations, if you have access to a node to bootstrap with you can be part of it.
I don't exist!
I may be the same inmysocks you see on mastodon.social.... Maybe.
Whatever pronouns you feel like? I would be amused if you alternated.