Yes, it's subtle, but it gets ingrained. Child 1 is trained to believe "whether or not I accomplish something is because of something innate in me", and Child 2 is trained to believe "whether or not I accomplish something is a function of the work I put in".
Child 2 sees failure as an obstacle to be overcome and redoubles their effort.
Child 1 sees failure as a /personal/ failure and seeks something else that they know they'll succeed at.
Two children have just completed a task. Both are praised for completing it.
Child 1 hears: "You're so smart, good job!"
Child 2 hears: "You did such good work, good job!"
They feel roughly the same, but there's a substantial difference. Consider the implications:
Child 1 hears: "You have an innate ability that allowed you to complete this task."
Child 2 hears: "You did a lot of work that allowed you to complete this task."
Now do you see the difference?
@noelle I recall reading somewhere that in US Army (?) training, instructors make a point to never say "you're a good leader" and instead use a phrase like "you put a lot of work into leadership" instead.
This concept is some real-ass shit and I wish more people knew about it.
you open the chest and dramatic treasure music plays. inside you find.......
@vahnj the bow on the tail is an absolutely wonderful touch.
I fucking just can't with this paper right now 😂
"Methanolysis of the Cyclic Acetal Function of NanoKid Catalyzed by NanoGoblin, the Pyridinium Salt of Tetracyanocyclopentadienide"
Also Lucy Liu is a stunningly talented actor. She does the thing where you can just look at her face and tell exactly what her character is thinking.
I am Andrew Ryan! And I propose a question...
is a girl not entitled to the but of we're both girls?
@midi_mac you played with honor.
as best I can tell the reason for that much emphasis placed on polynomial equations in algebra class is that a while ago mathematicians realized you could treat them as numbers in their own right (as vectors) & proofs about them were very much in vogue in the 16th and 17th centuries, the mathematical era before calculus became fashionable
& we don't really revisit our math curriculums, we just put new stuff on the end. So polynomials come before calculus comes before topological set theory &c
@starkatt In short: They wanted to make super digital gold and one of the ways to do that was to make it concretely finite.
@mmsword well that does make sense if you're bad at economics.
consent, simulation
@confusedcharlot I vote no.
Moving to @starkatt
I'm a leftist trans gay fox girl. More than one thing can be true at a time. I believe in agency, subjectivity, and beauty.
In my day job, I'm an apprentice electrician.
Please introduce yourself when sending a follow request if we haven't recently chatted. Interacting with me is encouraged even if I don't follow back. I'm here to get to know people, not be a fountain of Content.
🕯️