snark
There's sort of a nightmarish beauty in reading an argument that's immune to rebuttal due to sheer syntactical incoherency. Not just "incoherent" in the base sense of "makes no moral sense in my world," but literally just so poorly written you can not actually figure out what they're trying to say, let alone debate it.
It takes a certain... anti-skill to craft such things. A truly fine example can be marvelous in its craft, much the same as the aposematic markings on a toxic animal.