Jessica @cat@awoo.space

@noiob same though

@amphetamine@sprite.land @Trev@containment.space just throw them in the reactor (also I can’t see whatever post this was in reply to so)

@noiob sorry

@amphetamine@sprite.land irrelevant, she’ll do just fine

@Ronflaix dematerialized?

@meena @MeimuHakurei@mastodon.social it’s long but it’s good as hell

@hirojin yes, a thousand of them

@vi but like do you want it open source or not?

“woman who lived as a man” ok let me stop you right there because you’ve made a horrible mistake already

@moritzheiber yep!

@hirojin not a member ;)

@saxnot cmon

every time I try to do routing in Rails I feel a large amount of despair

⁣

how do you retry on travis?

I guess uh, force pushing an amended commit so it has a new sha?

some tips:
• please be clear about whether you’re interested in a proposed change or not
• if tested code is presented, please do not bikeshed whether the change is possible
• please do not let your only comment on a PR match this regex: /^s\/[\w.#]+\/[\w.#]*\/$/

I don’t know how to ask the men in open source to be kind and it’s honestly exhausting

this isn’t even a joke this rule already works like that

if homebrew were on the app store it’d be rated 12+ for Infrequent/Mild Alcohol, Tobacco or Drug Use or References

I realise that hypothetically nobody needs to *justify* their license’s terms but why would you tack this probably-unenforceable, legally extremely ambiguous line onto 2-clause BSD?